Cases 51 - 60 of 15,137
USI Insurance Services LLC v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
USI Insurance Services LLC
Defendant:
Douglas Mitchell and Reed Schacht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02366
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02366
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Reed v. Nix et al
as 6:2024cv06077
Plaintiff:
Michelle Reed
Defendant:
Franklin Jordan Nix and Johnson Bros. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Allen v. All 7 continents et al
as 4:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Denver Fenton Allen
Defendant:
All 7 continents, Mas-Govt., MD Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed-Jones v. O'Donnell
as 3:2024cv00874
Petitioner:
Aaron Reed-Jones
Respondent:
Nicole Morrisey O'Donnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 U.S. Services Employment/Reemployment Act of 1994
Smith v. Ivey et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Smith
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Nancy Buckner, Brandon Hardin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Tommie James Reed, Jr.
Defendant:
John Doe and Sheriff S. Ward Calhoun, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
