Cases 71 - 80 of 144
King v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv00985
Petitioner:
Michael L. King
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Muathe, et al v. Fleming, et al
as 17-3095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KASEY KING and ERIC M. MUATHE
Plaintiff:
JULIE STOVER, NOAH DAY, LESTER MOORE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LORI B. FLEMING, KURTIS LOY, MY TOWN MEDIA, INC. and others
Defendant:
WILLIAM BILL WACHTER
Attorney - Appellant:
ADEBAYO I.K. OGUNMENO
Neill v. Clear Connections Group, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00333
Defendant:
Clear Connections Group, LLC and Michael Ray King, Jr.
Plaintiff:
DJ Neill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SEVION-EL v. KING et al
as 1:2017cv00437
Defendant:
THOMAS A. CANNON, JR., STEVEN G. CRAYCRAFT and MICHAEL A. KING
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
MARTIZE JAMES SEVION-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vassel v. Firststorm Properties 2 LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00691
Defendant:
Albert Basal, Jeffrey A. Bodoff, Mark R. Cashman and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Anthony Vassel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
United States of America v. King et al(MAG2)
as 1:2016mc03766
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael W. King
Garnishee:
Edward Jones Investments
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
David Klein v. Medivation, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv05154
Plaintiff:
David Klein
Defendant:
Medivation, Inc. , David T. Hung , Kathryn E. Blickenstaff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Michael King v. Frank Perry
as 16-6435
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY KING
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK PERRY, Secretary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
