Cases 71 - 80 of 421
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 132 Pension Fund v. Taylor et al
as 3:2019cv00511
Defendant:
Ginger Marcella Kuhen, Diana Taylor, Diana L. Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 132 Pension Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Taylor v. USA
as 1:2019cv00208
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
David W Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Taylor v. Beasley
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Gene Beasley and USA
Plaintiff:
David W Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taylor v. Collins et al
as 1:2019cv01025
Defendant:
C/O E. Gonzales, Sergeant FNU Collins, C/O J. Long and others
Plaintiff:
John W. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Latterson et al v. S-3 Pump Service Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00071
Defendant:
Tim Horn, Malcolm H Sneed, III, David Horn and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy McCray, Brandon Latterson, Jeremy Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Samuels v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-5002
Defendant / Appellee:
ALISSA PREBLE HUTTER, DAVID BEEN, MARK KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDE LEE SAMUELS
TAYLOR v. NICHOLSON, et al.
as 2:2019cv00043
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON and P. COUNTERMAN
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv03753
Defendant:
TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAYLOR v. NICHOLSON
as 2:2018cv00495
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER NICHOLSON
Plaintiff:
JOHN W. TAYLOR, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Trembly et al
as 3:2018cv01316
Defendant:
Officer P. Trembly and Mount Juliet Police Department
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
