Cases 1 - 10 of 4,799
Singleton v. United States Of America
as 4:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Arthur Singleton
Respondent:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kenneth Creel v. Gary Junker
as 24-6449
Plaintiff:
KENNETH RAY CREEL
Defendant:
GARY JUNKER, DR. ARTHUR CAMPBELL, DEBRA FITZGERALD and others
Miles v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv11243
Petitioner:
Arthur Miles
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Heun
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones and Abdul Haseeb Ibu Jones Bey
Defendant:
Arthur "Art" Heun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Babineau v. Collins et al
as 2:2024cv02072
Plaintiff:
James A. Babeneau
Defendant:
Warden Emma Collins, Arthur Hale, M.D., Andrew Eddy, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 1:2024cv00513
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) DePonte v. Bowman, et al.
as 2:2024cv01262
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Jessica Bowman and Daniel Queava
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. Benedict et al
as 6:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Brentrez Jarmykus McPherson and Royal Great Levi King - Chief Levi Priest Yaheshiah
Defendant:
Pope Benedict, Department of Corrections, Georgia Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
