Cases 1 - 10 of 278
Tuggle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02511
Plaintiff:
James Tuggle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tuggle v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv01167
Plaintiff:
Joshua Tuggle
Defendant:
Cord Williams, Christian L. Pyles, E Spiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Tuggles
as 3:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Devora Tuggles
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
TUGGLE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
BRYAN TUGGLE
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and OBADIAH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUGGLE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
TAMERA TUGGLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Bridge v. CommonSpirit Health
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Connie Tuggle Bridge
Defendant:
CommonSpirit Health doing business as CHI Memorial
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Johnny Gregory v. Bank OZK, et al
as 24-10085
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BRETT GREGORY
Defendant:
BANK OZK and MCCAMY, PHILLIPS, TUGGLE & FORDAM, LLP ESCROW ACCOUNTS
Sylestine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv01721
Plaintiff:
Ralph Jason Sylestine, Thomas Stock, Rodney Stockman and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
