Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,885
Standridge v. Pierce et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff: Tyler Standridge
Defendant: Pierce, Wade and Does Classification and CO 1, Cummins Unit, ADC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff: Anthony David Burch
Defendant: Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce
as 6:2024cv00595
Plaintiff: Jeffrey A Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00483
Petitioner: Henry Pierce Payne
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pierce v. Robinson
as 4:2024cv00570
Petitioner: James Eugene Pierce
Respondent: Warden Norm Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierce v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01301
Plaintiff: Robert Pierce
Defendant: State of Georgia, Fulton County Sheriffs Office and Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff: Tyronne Pierce
Defendant: John Doe and Commissioner of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Antiona Phillips v. Donald Compton, et al
as 24-1575
Plaintiff: Antiona Lee Phillips
Defendant: Donald Compton, Rehab Program Manager, ADC, Pierce, Mental Health Advocate Supervisor, ADC, Dexter Payne, Chief Assistant Deputy Director, DOC and others
Hall v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv00762
Plaintiff: Mikal Hall
Defendant: Anthony Wills, Latoya Hughes, Kelly Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff: JOHN SIMS
Defendant: SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?