Cases 1 - 10 of 636
Meyers v. Rosch et al
as 2:2024cv00348
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Kyle Rosch, Chadwick Dotson, S. Soloman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shambourger et al v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Howard Shambourger, Ronae Hughes and Esther Crawley
Defendant:
New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crawley #230375 v. Hope College et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Walter Crawley #230375
Defendant:
Hope College, Richard Raymond, David Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAWLEY v. INTERNATIONAL GUARDS UNION OF AMERICA LOCAL 160
as 1:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
ROSA CRAWLEY
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL GUARDS UNION OF AMERICA LOCAL 160
Charmaine Prater v. Tara Chestnut, et al
as 24-1480
Plaintiff:
OVA 467 and CHARMAINE PRATER
Defendant:
TARA CHESTNUT, ROXANE CRAWLEY, ESQUIRE, PHILADELPHIA LEGAL ASSISTANCE and others
Cohen v. Flagstaff Arts and Leadership Academy Incorporated et al
as 3:2024cv08046
Plaintiff:
Eli Cohen
Defendant:
Flagstaff Arts and Leadership Academy Incorporated, Andy Bessler, James Yih and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crawley v. Roberts et al
as 2:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Crawley
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, Sandy Whitbread, Dana Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv02006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thomas Crawley v. Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System et al
as 2:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Thomas Crawley
Defendant:
Los Angeles City Employee's Retirement System, City of Los Angeles and Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
