Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Mason v. Perry et al
as 2:2026cv01255
Defendant:
Kanda, Brown, J. Vansickle and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Oklahoma County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 5:2026cv03229
Defendant:
John Does 16-20, John Does 11-15, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Cicley Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knott v. Cruz et al
as 4:2026cv00070
Defendant:
C.O. Cook, C/O Kries, Mrs. Riddle and others
Plaintiff:
Issac S. Knott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARR v. LEHMAN et al
as 1:2026cv02395
Defendant:
LIA EXPRESS LOGISTICS, INC. and MASON S. LEHMAN
Plaintiff:
DANIEL P. MARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Feldman et al v. FCA US, LLC
as 1:2026cv01430
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sean Scherer, Rodny Helal, Jan Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Mason v. Bowers
as 26-11032
Defendant:
Kara Gougler, In Her Official Capacity as the TCCO Director of Case Management Services and John David Bowers, Facility Administrator of the MTC Owned
Plaintiff:
Brien Mason
United States v. Terrance Mason, Jr.
as 26-3283
Defendant:
Terrance Lamont Mason, Jr., also known as Terrance Mason, Jr.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Hafen v. Griffin et al
as 4:2026cv40250
Defendant:
Daniel Fales, Mark Mason, Christopher Daggett and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Charles Hafen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Mason v. Chelini
as 2:2026cv03678
Respondent:
Amy Chelini
Plaintiff:
Ricki Lamar Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd et al v. Dickson Plumbing, LLC
as 3:2026cv01749
Defendant:
Dickson Plumbing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Fitters Local No. 110 Trust Fund and Annuity Fund, Debra Mason and Joshua Boyd
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
