Cases 1 - 10 of 6,349
Pimentel v. Charleston County et al
as 9:2025cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Samuel Pimentel
Defendant:
Charleston County, Snyder and Gorden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Snyder v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00006
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jamie Nicole Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KANABLE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv02289
Defendant:
T. DAVIS, K. GILMORE, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
KRISTOPHER KANABLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIVAS v. SORACE et al
as 5:2024cv06923
Defendant:
RANDY KING, DANENE SORACE, THE CITY OF LANCASTER and others
Plaintiff:
IRENE GRIVAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Snyder et al
as 4:2024cv05172
Defendant:
Sergeant Scharf and Chaplain Snyder
Plaintiff:
Mario Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rahaman v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance et al
as 2:2024cv13459
Plaintiff:
Joy Rahaman [E-filer]
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance, Jason Snyder, Michelle Boedeker and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Taylor v. Snyder
as 2:2024cv02153
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Defendant:
C/O Snyder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv09876
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2sh Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Shambaugh v. The Potomac Edison Company et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Keith Andrew Shambaugh and Alison Shambaugh
Defendant:
The Potomac Edison Company and Rodney Edward Snyder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Duarte v. Norfolk County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2024cv13115
Defendant:
Deputy Linsky, Captain Russo, Lt. Patrick Weir and others
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
