Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Tober et al v. Frelich et al
as 4:2023cv00278
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Tober and Neil Tober
Defendant:
Alan E. Frelich, James R. Tober and Tober Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Havens v. Mills et al
as 2:2022cv00299
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Havens
Defendant:
Bill Mills, John Gutierrez, Armando Chapa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Tober v. General Motors LLC et al
as 2:2022cv08312
Plaintiff:
Joe Tober
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Mike Thomson Recreational Vehicles and U.S. Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Weakley v. Bailey et al
as 1:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Travell Maurice Lynn Weakley
Defendant:
L. Paul Bailey, K. Robbins, A. Tober and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cellucci et al v. Foster Garvey et al
as 2:2022cv01315
Plaintiff:
Rita Dos Santos, Anthony Cellucci, Jesus Alberto Matienzo and others
Defendant:
Foster Garvey, Robert C. Weaver, Samuel Kauffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Joe Tober v. Forest River, Inc.
as 2:2021cv08770
Plaintiff:
Joe Tober
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin Tober v. Laura Armstead
as 21-6801
Defendant / Appellee:
LAURA ARMSTEAD, Warden, L. JOBE, Sgt. and P. OWENS, Sgt.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTIN GRIJALVA TOBER
Tober v. Armstead et al
as 1:2020cv03780
Defendant:
L. Jobe, P. Ownes and Laura Armstead
Plaintiff:
Martin Grijalva Tober
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
CURRY et al v. BRAM AUTO GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv12090
Defendant:
BRAM AUTO GROUP, LLC, MICHAEL DELACRUZ and ROUTE 22 NISSAN, INC.
Plaintiff:
DAVID TOBER and RASHEEM CURRY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
