Cases 51 - 60 of 87
King-Miller et al v. Atrium Medical Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv00266
Defendant:
Atrium Medical Corporation, Getinge AB and Maquet Cardiovascular US Sales, LLC
Plaintiff:
Maria King-Miller and Charles Allen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Miller v. Costco Wholesale Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv00408
Cross Claimant:
Costco Wholesale Corp.
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corp., Lotus Foods, Inc., Pride Industries and others
Cross Defendant:
Lotus Foods, Inc., Pride Industries, Rheas Trans, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MILLER et al v. CITY OF JOHNSTOWN et al
as 3:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN MILLER , KASANDARA MCINTIRE and B.M.
Defendant:
CITY OF JOHNSTOWN , EAST TAYLOR TOWNSHIP and EAST CONEMAUGH BOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Miller
as 16-8080
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL ALLEN MILLER
Miller v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00255
Petitioner:
Scott Allen Miller
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Tx
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miller v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv05723
Petitioner:
Bart Allen Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MILLER v. USA
as 1:2016cv00719
Petitioner:
ROBERT ALLEN MILLER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MILLER v. WARDEN
as 2:2016cv00131
Petitioner:
WILLIAM ALLEN MILLER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miller v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv00569
Petitioner:
William Allen Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
United States v. Miller
as 15-8040
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PAUL ALLEN MILLER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
