Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Compton v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2026cv00051
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lee Compton
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg and LPD Officer Javaz Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kisiah et al v. Martin et al
as 3:2026cv00145
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Kisiah and Amanda Lee Griffin
Defendant:
K. Martin and J. Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holt v. Town Of Flower Mound et al
as 4:2026cv00185
Plaintiff:
Precious Holt
Defendant:
Dr. Julie Nahar, Jack Oliver, III, Officer Abbey McMullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clay v. Lee et al
as 4:2026cv00077
Plaintiff:
Devontea Clay
Defendant:
Holman, Brunner, Amanda Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv00379
Plaintiff:
AMANDA LEE
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv02347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
LEE et al v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv02141
Plaintiff:
AMANDA LEE and MATTHEW LEE
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZIEGLER v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2025cv01563
Plaintiff:
AMANDA LEE ZIEGLER
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2025cv08577
Plaintiff:
Amanda Lee Jones and Sky Ann Fass
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
