Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Amy Thomas v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 16-4559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Amy Thomas
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Bombard et al v. Beazer Homes Sales Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02534
Plaintiff:
Avie Bombard , Marco Duran , Renee Duran and others
Defendant:
Beazer Homes Sales Incorporated , Beazer Homes Holdings Corporation and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thomas et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06652
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas and Donald Thomas
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
THOMAS v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00019
Defendant:
ELI LILLY & COMPANY
Plaintiff:
AMY THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEARD et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
YVETTE BEARD, JUDY BRANT, TERRY BROWN and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Rivera et al
as 1:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas and E.T.
Defendant:
Ramon Rivera, Jr., Edgar Alvarez , E A G Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
as 4:2015cv00502
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Whitmore v. Tharpe et al
as 6:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
David Robin Whitmore
Defendant:
Bobby Tharpe , Bruce Brannon, Becky Guffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Firerock Products,LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00109
Plaintiff:
Amy Thomas , John Thomas , Carole Murphey and others
Defendant:
Firerock Products,LLC and General Shale Brick, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
