Cases 21 - 30 of 2,345
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Patterson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Eugene P Patterson
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Justice, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Krauchuk et al v. ASH/TEC, INC. et al
as 7:2024cv02417
Plaintiff:
Bruce Krauchuk and Julie Krauchuk
Defendant:
ASH/TEC, INC. and ASHLAND TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company et al
as 2:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Ashely Garcia
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and Gerber Products Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ash v. Bredar
as 1:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Julian R. Ash
Defendant:
Judge James K. Bredar and James K. Bredar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kyle Ash et al v. Axos Bank
as 8:2024cv00534
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ash and Moshe Stempel
Defendant:
Axos Bank doing business as UFB Direct
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Ash v. City of Portland
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Ash
Defendant:
City of Portland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Mott et al
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Carrie Ash Mott, John Doe, The Joint Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davenell Ash v. Duluth Police Dept., et al
as 24-1459
Plaintiff:
Davenell L. Ash
Defendant:
Duluth Police Department and Minnesota State Patrol
Landis v. Greyson et al
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Barry Landis
Defendant:
Ash Greyson, Jason Brown, Robert Taylor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
