Cases 1 - 10 of 3,665
Baker v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05898
Defendant:
CooperSurgical, Inc., The Cooper Companies, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Asia N. Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barker v. Hooper
as 2:2024cv02934
Plaintiff:
Samuel Barker
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Jefferson County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2024cv01558
Defendant:
Ossolo, McDonnagal, Mattheny and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon David Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens v. Harris et al
as 3:2024cv03051
Defendant:
Abigail Williams, Michael Boatman, Jacy Barker and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dace v. Jivkova et al
as 1:2024cv12720
Defendant:
Pendergrast, Charles Truitt, Arnston and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Dace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Barker v. Edward Boettcher, et al
as 24-3252
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. BARKER
Defendant:
EDWARD BOETTCHER and BEVERLY BOETTCHER
Real Party In Interest:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kenneth Chambers v. Sarah Evans Barker
as 24-3233
Respondent:
SARAH EVANS BARKER
Petitioner:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Bowie v. Hower et al
as 1:2024cv02105
Defendant:
Timothy J. Barker, Wayne Kenneth Ross, City of York and others
Plaintiff:
Tyree Bowie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shattuck v. Currie et al
as 4:2024cv01665
Defendant:
Unknown Batreal, Unknown Myler, Robert E. Lee Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Shattuck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
