Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Barker v. USA
as 1:2026cv00285
Petitioner: Rebecca Lynn Barker
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Christian Healthcare Centers, Inc. v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 26-1801
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN HEALTHCARE CENTERS, INC.
Defendant: DANA NESSEL, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Michigan, JOHN E. JOHNSON, JR., in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Michigan Deptartment of Civil Rights, LUKE R. LONDO, in his official capacity as member of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission and others
Chantrienes Barker v. Jeremy Howard
as 26-1796
Petitioner: CHANTRIENES BARKER
Respondent: JEREMY HOWARD, Warden
Barker v. Dysart
as 26-30534
Plaintiff: Samuel Barker
Defendant: Daniel Dysart, Kyle Daly and United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1787
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Barker v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 4:2026cv10029
Plaintiff: Anthony Barker
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Alfred Barkers-Okwan v. State of New York Office of Child Support Services, et al
as 26-3201
Plaintiff: ALFRED BARKERS-OKWAN
Defendant: STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, (OCSS), U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE CO
Ross v. Knoxville County Detention Center et al
as 3:2026cv00418
Plaintiff: Jacob T. Ross
Defendant: Knoxville County Detention Center, Knoxville County Police Dept, NBA Youngboy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Richmond County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2026cv00181
Plaintiff: Max R. Barker
Defendant: Richmond County Sheriff Office, Deputy John Doe and Officer Camancho
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Harris Insights and Analytics LLC et al
as 1:2026cv10275
Plaintiff: Ryan Barker
Defendant: Harris Insights and Analytics LLC, Stagwell, Inc., Mark Penn and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?