Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Dean v. Cain et al
as 3:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Clifton Dean
Defendant:
Burl Cain, John Hunt, Mike Dixon and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Nicholas Purpura
as 26-3260
Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Respondent:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK NA, & CO., JAMES DIMON, DEAN COOPER and others
Simpson v. Benton et al
as 6:2026cv03573
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Simpson
Defendant:
Megan Benton and Roseann Ketchmark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bell v. Hardee Correctional Institution
as 8:2026cv02570
Plaintiff:
Benton Bell
Defendant:
Hardee Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. SARGENT et al
as 1:2026cv03103
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN ANTONIO MURPHY
Defendant:
PAMELA MEAD SARGENT, JENNIFER REBECCA BOCKHORST, NANCY COMB DICKENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trigild IVL LLC, Greystar v. Benton
as 1:2026cv04962
Plaintiff:
Trigild IVL LLC, Greystar
Defendant:
Trinstin Benton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Glass v. John Peter Smith Jail Health Division
as 4:2026cv01082
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
John Peter Smith Jail Health Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glass v. Arlington Police Dept
as 4:2026cv01087
Plaintiff:
Edward Benton Glass
Defendant:
Arlington Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
