Cases 1 - 10 of 8,122
Jones, Brent M. v. Yarusso et al
as 1:2024cv21958
Plaintiff:
Brent Michael Jones and Brent Micheal Jones
Defendant:
A. Yarusso, H. Fitoria, B. Campos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johns v. United States of America et al
as 0:2024cv01892
Plaintiff:
Nicole Johns
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Indian Bureau of Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Old School Sales, LLC et al v. Cooper et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Old School Sales, LLC doing business as Old School Vapor and Sak Wholesale, LLC
Defendant:
Brent Cooper, Don Brite, Andrew Burdett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Haynes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02569
Plaintiff:
Brent Haynes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
P.H. v. Agape Baptist Church, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv03149
Defendant:
James McCrary, Agape Baptist Church, Inc. doing business as Agape Boarding School, Julio Sandoval and others
Plaintiff:
P.H.
CLARE et al v. MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.
as 3:2024cv06146
Plaintiff:
CANDICE CLARE, BRENT FREBURG, JON CROTEAU and others
Defendant:
MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC. and MAZDA MOTOR CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
