Cases 1 - 10 of 106,283
Baldwin v. Duquette et al
as 1:2024cv13183
Plaintiff:
Benoit Baldwin
Defendant:
Charles Duquette and Town of Tisbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Smith
as 24-7723
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHARLES SMITH
v. CITY OF RICHMOND et al
as 3:2024cv09411
Defendant:
CITY OF RICHMOND, Mr. ENRIQUE CASTILLO, Mr. NICHOLAS REMICK and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. TRAYVON HARDIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fathers of St. Charles a.k.a. The Congregation of the Missionaries of St. Charles Scalabrinians St. John the Baptist Province et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2024cv13197
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Director Loren K Miller and Ur M Jaddou
Plaintiff:
Priests of the Sacred Heart, Andrzej Sudol, Gowri Dhakshinamoorthy and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Wahla et al v. Breville USA Inc
as 2:2024cv11059
Plaintiff:
Tammy Wahla and Charles Allen
Defendant:
Breville USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knight v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq02702
Plaintiff:
Charles Knight
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terry v. Frame
as 2:2024cv00735
Respondent:
Superintendent Jonathan Frame
Plaintiff:
Charles Terry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Charles Pettigrew, III
as 24-6142
Defendant:
CHARLES E. PETTIGREW, III
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Hinshaw v. Clark
as 4:2024cv01125
Defendant:
Charles Clark
Plaintiff:
James Michael Hinshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Cooper
as 4:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Charles Eric Lee
Defendant:
Jacob Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
