Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv13485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 26-2525
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NICOLE AARONSON, KAYLA ARSLANIAN and others
Filla v. Filla et al
as 3:2026cv01172
Plaintiff:
Ella L. Filla
Defendant:
John G. Filla, Judge Charles H.W. Burch, Scott Snicker, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Calhoun
as 3:2026cv00729
Plaintiff:
Demetric Mitchell
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Graham v. Calhoun
as 3:2026cv00721
Plaintiff:
Derrikas Graham
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stevens #946853 v. Hinkley et al
as 1:2026cv02515
Plaintiff:
Robert Jory Stevens #946853
Defendant:
Steve Hinkley and Calhoun County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. Ward Calhoun
as 3:2026cv00714
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shane Olson
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cunningham v. Taylor et al
as 4:2026cv07294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Demon Cunningham
Defendant:
Gregory Taylor, Michael Skinner, Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batiste v. Western Flyer Express, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00287
Plaintiff:
Loretta Batiste
Defendant:
Western Flyer Express, LLC and Michael Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Brown v. Ward Calhoun
as 3:2026cv00698
Plaintiff:
Decamron Brown
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
