Cases 41 - 50 of 22,246
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01143
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Semple et al
as 3:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Joseph Carter
Defendant:
Semple and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodowicz v. Feldman, Perlstein & Greene, LLC
as 24-997
Not Yet Classified:
CARTER RODOWICZ and FELDMAN, PERLSTEIN & GREENE, LLC
Kevin Giles v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-1320
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LA'VON GILES
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, DAWN N. ISON, DIANE NICOLE PRINC and others
Carter v. Records
as 1:2024mc00195
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Mike Records
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE CHILDREN YOUTH FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Mr. PATRICK ROBINSON, P. R. 1, a minor, P. R. 2, a minor and others
Defendant:
Allegheny County Office Children Youth Family Services, Courtney Reinhart, Ashly Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Carter-Haston et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Hanif Rahim Bey
Defendant:
Carter-Haston, Brownlee Whitlow & Praet, L. Marc Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
