Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 164
CENTENE CORPORATION et al v. MERCK & COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv23033
Plaintiff: CENTENE CORPORATION, WellCare Health Plans, Inc., NEW YORK QUALITY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION doing business as FIDELIS CARE and others
Defendant: Merck & Company Inc, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation, SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC v. CENTENE CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv05057
Plaintiff: ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES, LLC doing business as GENESIS DIAGNOSTICS
Defendant: CENTENE CORPORATION, MAGNOLIA HEALTH PLAN INC., ABC COMPANIES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01585
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hendley v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05610
Plaintiff: Michelle M. Hendley
Defendant: Centene Corporation, Centene Management Company LLC and Ambetter of Peach State, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Samuel et al v. Centene Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01134
Plaintiff: Harry Samuel, Christopher Robert Desmond and Arthur Govan
Defendant: Centene Corporation, Centurion of Delaware LLC, VitalCore Health Strategies and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re HIV Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02573
Plaintiff: Peter Staley, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31, Insurance Trust Fund, Gregg S. Gonsalves, PhD and others
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson Inc., E. R. Squibb & Sons, LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Amicus Curiae: HIV Organizations and Federal Trade Commission
Respondent: State of New Mexico ex rel. Hector H. Balderas, New Mexico Attorney General
Petitioner: Jacksonville Police Officers and Fire Fighters Health Insurance Trust and John F Cogan
Interested Party: Designating non-party Aurobindo USA, Inc., Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc. and Strides Pharma, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Amneal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Cipla USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00252
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ruiz v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff: Angel P Ruiz
Defendant: Arizona, State of, Centurion Health Incorporated, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
In re Accellion, Inc. Data Breach Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv01155
Defendant: Accellion, Inc., Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. doing business as Flagstar Bank, Flagstar Bank FSB and others
Plaintiff: Madalyn Brown, Cole McDowell, Christy Brockington and others
Petitioner: Grace Beyer
Intervenor: Philip Angus, Mark Wiedder, Jackie Stone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?