Cases 1 - 10 of 1,575
BROWN v. DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT et al
as 2:2024cv01666
Defendant:
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DELAWARE COUNTY GOVERNMENT, PA. DEPT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
ALTON D. BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corron v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Justin Corron
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, Garlands Welding & Mechanical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04307
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY D BROWN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Taylor v. Brown
as 2:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
Mark D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browne-Butler v. Delaware Funds By MacQuerie
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Ms. Suzanne D. Browne-Butler
Defendant:
Delaware Funds By MacQuerie and Bank of America Bank Of America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brown v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Elijah D Brown
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Otts et al
as 6:2024cv06017
Plaintiff:
Ce'drick D. Brown
Defendant:
Major Fredrick Otts, Sergeant B. Morgan and Corporal Shanlever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
Brown v. The Sherwin Williams Company
as 1:2024cv10313
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Brown, III
Defendant:
The Sherwin Williams Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
