Cases 1 - 10 of 79
HESTAND v. Office of the Inspector General et al
as 6:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
JAMON HESTAND
Defendant:
Office of the Inspector General, Officer Curtis D. Bitz, Officer Candace Stevick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Straney v. Sawyer et al
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Christopher Straney
Defendant:
Kathleen H Sawyer, Deborah G Schult and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hooper v. Phelps et al
as 2:2020cv02078
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, The, Dr. Deborah G Schult, Dr. Walton P Battle and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2020cv00212
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. WILSON, J. E. KRUEGER, B. LAMMER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2020cv00359
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Rodriguez
Respondent:
Deborah G Cockrell and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeri v. Finley et al
as 5:2019ct03325
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Max Jeri
Defendant:
John Doe, Scott Finley, Assistant Director, Deborah G. Schult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeri v. Finley et al
as 1:2019cv01805
Defendant:
John Doe, Deborah G. Schult, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Max Jeri
Amicus Curiae:
Mr UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. Baty et al
as 2:2019cv00809
Defendant:
Ms Brown, Tecora Ballom, T Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Kane et al
as 2:2019at00271
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Boudreau, Mary Mitchell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. McCarthy et al
as 4:2019cv00096
Defendant:
Robert Stanton, U.S. Probation Office, Michael John Daly and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
