Cases 61 - 70 of 125
Peterson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15693
Plaintiff:
Shirley Louise Peterson and Dale William Peterson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07601
Plaintiff:
Connie R. Williams and Dale Williams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Debrow v. Caddo Parish Commission et al
as 5:2015cv01717
Plaintiff:
Orlando Mandell Debrow
Defendant:
Caddo Parish Commission, Caddo Correctional Center, Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Doty et al
as 7:2015cv00022
Plaintiff:
Larry Dale Williams
Defendant:
Lawrence Doty, Richard Wathen, Tommy Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Dale William Lochmiller v. Daniel Paramo et al
as 5:2015cv00061
Petitioner:
Dale William Lochmiller
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and The Attorney General of The State of California Kamila Harris
SIMS v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2014cv01975
Plaintiff:
ARICA LYNN SIMS
Defendant:
VINCIENT DALE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnhart v. Carroll County, Ohio et al
as 4:2014cv01533
Plaintiff:
Devan J. Barnhart
Defendant:
Carroll County, Ohio, Dale Williams, Carroll County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Anderson Dale Williams et al v. Navistar Inc et al
as 5:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Twyla A Williams and Estate of Anderson Dale Williams
Defendant:
Navistar Inc and John Does
Thirdparty_defendant:
Schwarze Industries Inc
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Navistar Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Williams et al v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2014cv02259
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Williams and Dale Williams
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
