Cases 31 - 40 of 110
Noworyta v. Wolfe et al
as 4:2018cv02601
Defendant:
David Leon Wolfe and DL Trucking LLC
Plaintiff:
Samuel Noworyta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Atencio et al
as 1:2018cv00216
Petitioner:
David Leon Johnson
Respondent:
Henry Atencio and Carmen Dyas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nickell v. The Metropolitan et al
as 3:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
David Leon Nickell
Defendant:
The Metropolitan and Christina Osborne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Reeder v. Vanpelt et al
as 6:2018cv00416
Plaintiff:
David Leon Reeder
Defendant:
R W Vanpelt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caddell v. Conway, City of et al
as 4:2018cv00166
Plaintiff:
William D. Caddell
Defendant:
Conway, City of , Tammy Lynn Carter , Cunha M. Juvenal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
David Leon Walker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
David Stokes, II v. William Montgomery, et al
as 17-15813
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEON STOKES II, AKA David L. Stokes II
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM GERARD MONTGOMERY, Arizona Attorney General, DIANE MELOCHE, Deputy County Attorney, Maricopa, ROSA MROZ, named as Honorable Rosa Mroz (Judge), Maricopa County Superior Court and others
LEWICKI v. STATE OF INDIANA, COUNTY OF MADISON
as 1:2017cv00757
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEON LEWICKI
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, COUNTY OF MADISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stokes v. Montgomery et al
as 2:2017cv00367
Plaintiff:
David Leon Stokes, II
Defendant:
William G Montgomery, Diane Meloche, Rosa Mroz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carnahan v. Alpha Epsilon Pi Fraternity Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Evan L Carnahan
Defendant:
Alpha Epsilon PI Fraternity Inc and David Leon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
