Cases 81 - 90 of 281
YOUNG v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2019cv04469
Respondent:
MICHAEL OSBURN and MARK SEVIER
Petitioner:
DAVID YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. VANCE et al
as 5:2019cv00428
Defendant:
DAVID YOUNG, POLICE OFFICER DEFRANCO and CYRUS R VANCE, JR
Plaintiff:
DANA KYLE KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keele v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv05974
Plaintiff:
David Young Keele
Defendant:
Andrew, Commissioner of Social Security Saul and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GARCIA et al v. KNAPP et al
as 2:2019cv17946
Defendant:
JANINE BUCHALSKI, DAVID YOUNG, VINCENT LEO, III and others
Plaintiff:
ALISON GARCIA and GREGORY GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ARNOLD v. COY et al
as 1:2019cv03820
Defendant:
JAMIE COY, DAVID YOUNG, ANGEL PETTY and others
Plaintiff:
KEANDRE ARNOLD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Quinn et al v. Dermatech Research, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv07339
Plaintiff:
Paul Quinn and PDQ Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Dr. David Young, Scott Davis, Lori Jacobus and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harrison v. Crick et al
as 0:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Jason D. Bambel, Shelbi Helton, Peggy Adams and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 2:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON and SHAWNTRELL NORINGTON
Defendant:
GEORGE C. ZOLEY, NOAH SNIDER, DOUGLAS ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young v. Howard Ford Inc
as 3:2019cv00194
Plaintiff:
William David Young, III
Defendant:
Howard Ford Inc and Howard Ford Inc doing business as Ford of West Memphis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
JEWISH v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF
as 1:2019cv02266
Plaintiff:
KING JEW JEWISH and DAVID YOUNG
Defendant:
NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STAFF
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
