Cases 1 - 10 of 47
King v. USA
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Donald Eugene King
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
King et al v. The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
Donald A. King and The Dustin Inman Society, Inc.
Defendant:
The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Great American Insurance Company v. Burns et al
as 4:2021cv00078
Defendant:
Donald Wayne King, Tracy Burns, Peek Pavement Marking, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Great American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
King v. Lumpkin
as 1:2021cv00021
Petitioner:
Donald Ray King
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2020cv04232
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Donald Ray King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King et al v. The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00120
Plaintiff:
Donald A. King and The Dustin Inman Society, Inc.
Defendant:
The Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv02800
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Donald L King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00069
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00446
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
King v. Pem Properties et al
as 2:2016cv09876
Plaintiff:
Donald W. King
Defendant:
PEM Properties, Kent Wicker, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
