Cases 1 - 10 of 5,197
Bush v. Warden, FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00163
Petitioner:
Frederick Bush
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HENDERSON v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2024cv00126
Petitioner:
BOBBIE HENDERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN, FCI & FCP MCKEAN and CMC ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alward v. FCI Oxford et al
as 2:2024cv00566
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward and Matthew Keith Berry
Defendant:
FCI Oxford, Lt Broesch and Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WASHINGTON et al
as 1:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
LEONARD BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN M. WASHINGTON, SOE VENELLI, CMC ALLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Olvera-Galvan v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00155
Petitioner:
Francisco Javier Olvera-Galvan
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sanchez-Leyva v. Warden, FCI Fort Dix
as 6:2024cv00853
Petitioner:
Gerardo Antonio Sanchez-Leyva
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Orji, Michael v. Warden, FCI Oxford et al
as 3:2024cv00300
Petitioner:
Michael Afram Orji
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Oxford and I.C.E.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Rodney C. Compton
Defendant:
J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
