Cases 1 - 10 of 100
FULKS v. WARRICK COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2026cv00211
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM FULKS
Defendant:
WARRICK COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Fulk v. John Does 1-3
as 3:2026cv05864
Plaintiff:
Aaron Justin Fulk
Defendant:
John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayton v. Fulks
as 26-40434
Plaintiff:
Jason Clayton
Defendant:
Brook Fulks, Judge, in her official capacity, Stacey Samples, Sydney Robison and others
Harris et al v. City Utilities of Springfield, MO et al
as 6:2026cv03418
Plaintiff:
Edgar Harris and Michele Harris
Defendant:
City Utilities of Springfield, MO, City Utilities Headquarters/Board of Public Utilities, Dwayne Fulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fulk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026cv01621
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gregory A. Fulk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Harris v. Meherrin River Regional Jail et al
as 2:2026cv00700
Plaintiff:
Charles M. Harris
Defendant:
Meherrin River Regional Jail, Investigator Sasser, Correctional Officer Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Fulks
as 26-60357
Plaintiff:
Michael Jordan
Defendant:
Clayton Fulks, Arresting Officer, Evan Hubbard, Warden, Harrison County, Mississippi and others
Fulks v. Axil Brands, Inc.
as 8:2026cv00903
Plaintiff:
Darryl Fulks
Defendant:
Axil Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Asaf Fulks v. Raymond John Baldonado, Jr. et al
as 5:2026cv01081
Defendant:
Frenzee Broadcasting and Raymond John Baldonado, Jr. an individual doing business as Fatell doing business as Fatell Music Group
Plaintiff:
Asaf Fulks
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
