Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Jackson v. Gray
as 23-1487
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARRET JACKSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DEAN GRAY, Superintendent, Souza-Baranowski Correction Center
JACKSON v. BRICKMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
A. BRICKMAN, SARAH K., HOLLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Swims et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Mose S. Williams
Defendant:
Garret A. Swims, Phillip M. Dobbs, William H. Petty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riddle #811130 v. Green et al
as 2:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Trequan Riddle #811130
Defendant:
Garret Green, Amy Robare, Mark Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Hegarty et al
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Darus Wilkins
Defendant:
Mathew Joseph Hegarty, Lance Garret Eberhart and Michael E. Hegarty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neilton Gold v. Logan Edge, et al
as 5:2022cv05185
Plaintiff:
Neilton Marrik Gold
Defendant:
Logan Edge, Michael Smith, Sheriff Tim Helder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plater v. Topping et al
as 5:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Raheem La'monze Plater
Defendant:
Cristine Topping, Dr. FNU Weaks, FNU Rowley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hockemier v. Garret et al
as 3:2022cv00386
Petitioner:
Devon Ray Hockemier
Respondent:
Tim Garret and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Branson v. Britt et al
as 4:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
Guy D. Branson
Defendant:
Michael Britt, Kody Schur, Garret Saxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
