Cases 1 - 10 of 398
Costner v. Gram et al
as 3:2024cv00453
Defendant:
Shawn Gram, David Duggan and J. Scott Stuart
Plaintiff:
Steven S Costner, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amphy et al v. Monte Gram Trucking et al
as 6:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Gerald Lynn Amphy
Defendant:
Monte Scott Gram and Monte Gram Trucking
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Baker v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00887
Defendant:
Watson, Houston, King and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRANKLIN MUTUAL INSURANCE A/S/O GRAM REALTY CORP. v. RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY
as 2:2024cv08457
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN MUTUAL INSURANCE A/S/O GRAM REALTY CORP.
Defendant:
RHEEM MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones - RESTRICTED - ACCEPT NO FILINGS v. Indiana Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00600
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Indiana Department of Correction, Dawn Buss and others
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Stringer v. Gram et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Defendant:
Willie Mosley, Herb Frierson, Corrinia Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Lavel Stringer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRAMS et al v. AMAZON.COM INC et al
as 2:2024cv01378
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN GRAMS and KRISTA GRAMS
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM INC and SHENZHEN KANGERJIAN INTELLIGENT TECHNOLOGY CO.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Belcher, et al
as 24-1669
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lynn Tigue, Jr. and Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Belcher, RN, EARU, ADC, Gary Kerstein, EARU, ADC, Kelley, Lt., EARU, ADC and others
Sanchez v. City of Milwaukee Wisconsin et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Santos Sanchez
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee Wisconsin, Moises Gomez, George Irizarry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
