Cases 1 - 10 of 5,651
HILL v. LEE COUNTY PLUMBING AND WELL SERVICE
as 2:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE HILL
Defendant:
LEE COUNTY PLUMBING AND WELL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Turner v. Comcast et al
as 1:2024cv01613
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Comcast, Jesse Heurta, jennifer_khoury@comcast.com and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Hodges v. Henrico County Risk Management et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Henrico County Risk Management and Bradley Randall Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Top Metal Buyers Inc. et al v. Lopinot et al
as 3:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Top Metal Buyers Inc., Shelly Branson, Debra Mosby and others
Defendant:
Andrew Lopinot, St. Clair County, Joe Aiello and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
