Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thacker v. Sherman Police Department
as 4:2026cv00691
Plaintiff:
Robbie Dale Thacker
Defendant:
Sherman Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. SSA
as 6:2026cv00174
Plaintiff:
Cody Ryan Thacker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
COSTA et al v. USA
as 1:2026cv00623
Plaintiff:
STEVE COSTA, AMELIA HAEFNER, CARLOS LEBRON-THACKER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Thacker v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2026cv02473
Plaintiff:
Megan Amanda Joy Thacker
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Petrini et al v. Glavan et al
as 1:2026cv00094
Plaintiff:
Yuri Petrini and Jarrod Lewis Fusco
Defendant:
Kenny Glavan, Andrew Gilich, Jerry Creel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson v. Memphis Light Gas & Water et al
as 2:2026cv02220
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas & Water and Jeremy Thacker Individually doing business as Pridestaff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 633 Job Discrimination (Age - Federal-State Relationship)
THACKER v. MITRATECH HOLDINGS, INC et al
as 5:2026cv00929
Plaintiff:
JON THACKER
Defendant:
MITRATECH HOLDINGS, INC doing business as ASSUREHIRE and MANOR MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
