Cases 61 - 70 of 213
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Gray (Scott)
as 16-3973
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dewayne Gray, AKA Whip, John Evans, AKA Blaze, AKA Louie, Alexis Mills and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory Scott, AKA G Scott
EVANS v. SCM GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 3:2016cv00241
Plaintiff:
JOHN EVANS
Defendant:
SCM GROUP NORTH AMERICA, INC. and SCM GROUP S.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Evans v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv12257
Plaintiff:
John Evans
Defendant:
Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC , Dura-Line and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Clelland
as 5:2016hc02243
Petitioner:
F. John Evans
Respondent:
Jack Clelland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ADAMS POINTE I, L.P. et al v. TRU-FLEX METAL HOSE CORP. et al
as 2:2016cv00750
Defendant:
TRU-FLEX METAL HOSE CORP
Plaintiff:
ADAMS POINTE I, L.P, ADAMS POINTE III, L.P., COULTER & GRAHAM, LLP. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
WESBANCO BANK, INC., UNIQUE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCT COMPANY, ESB BANK and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
TRU-FLEX, LLC, PRO-FLEX LLC and TRU-FLEX METAL HOSE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans v. Griffin et al
as 3:2016cv03093
Plaintiff:
John Evans
Defendant:
Susan Griffin and Mr Kayira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Owens v. John Evan
as 16-1645
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden, Big Muddy River Correctional Center
Brewer et al v. Sproat et al
as 3:2016cv03014
Plaintiff:
Coralie Brewer and Douglas Young
Defendant:
Joshoua Sproat, Elizabeth Wilson, Erin Mattson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
