Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Capobianco et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv06125
Plaintiff:
Bridget Capobianco, Alex Leroy, Christian Batista and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Marcos Gonzalez Solas, Director of the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McGill et al v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2021cv08619
Plaintiff:
Jada McGill and Angie Velez
Defendant:
City Of New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Police Commissioner Dermot Shea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LIFEMD, INC et al v. LAMARCO et al
as 2:2021cv01273
Plaintiff:
LIFEMD, INC, JUSTIN SCHREIBER and STEFAN GALLUPPI
Defendant:
CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO, SHADYSIDE PARTNERS, LLC doing business as CULPER RESEARCH and JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mayer v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00269
Plaintiff:
Richard Mayer
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Airway Heights Corrections Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv12138
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NATASHA MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
LIFEMD, INC. et al v. LAMARCO et al
as 2:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
LIFEMD, INC., STEFAN GALLUPPI and JUSTIN SCHREIBER
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10, CHRISTIAN MATTHEW LAMARCO and CULPER RESEARCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irwin et al v. 90210 Management Company, LLC
as 1:2021cv00169
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, 90210 Management Company, LLC, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Shelli Irwin and James R. Irwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mendell v. Doe, et al.
as 1:2020cv00499
Plaintiff:
Zachary T. Mendell
Defendant:
John & Jane Doe 2-10 and I John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raydo v. City of New York
as 20-3685
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melanie Raydo and Daniel Lang
Defendant:
New York City Police Officer John Doe #1, individually, the names "John Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown and New York City Police Officers John and Jane Does #2-#10, individually, the names John Doe" and "Jane Doe" being fictitious as their complete names and/or current identities are presently unknown
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Police Officer Eric Rodriguez, individually and City of New York
Grange v. Prestige Financial Services Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv01561
Plaintiff:
Todd Grange
Defendant:
John & Jane Does 2-10, Prestige Financial Services Inc., Repossession Company Auto Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
