Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Lampley v. Bickham
as 26-30668
Respondent:
Edward Bickham, Warden, Dixon Correctional Institute
Petitioner:
Carlos Lampley
Lampley-Foster v. Federal Express Corporation
as 0:2026cv04405
Plaintiff:
Jerrett Lampley-Foster
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Lampley v. Kelley et al
as 6:2026cv03552
Plaintiff:
Harold Lampley
Defendant:
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO and Everett B Kelley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401 Labor Management Disclosure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Lampley v. TDCJ, Director
as 6:2026cv00231
Petitioner:
Erick A Lampley
Respondent:
TDCJ, Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams et al v. Agri Stats, Inc. et al (CONSENT)
as 2:2026cv00050
Plaintiff:
ALEXIS BIANCA ADAMS, CHRISTAL DENISE ANGLIN, Christopher Lemont Anglin and others
Defendant:
Agri Stats, Inc., Perdue Farms, Inc., Perdue Foods, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Lampley v. Godfrey
as 2:2026cv00026
Plaintiff:
Thomas V Lampley
Defendant:
James Godfrey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lampley v. Bodiford
as 2:2026cv00027
Petitioner:
Thomas V Lampley
Respondent:
Scotty Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Lampley v. Bisignano
as 1:2025cv15710
Plaintiff:
Passion N. Lampley
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LAMPLEY v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 1:2025cv00362
Plaintiff:
MARKESE D. LAMPLEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, ERIE COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
