Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jackson v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wade Jackson
Defendant:
Kathy L Smith, Dexter Payne and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00019
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elking et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03746
Plaintiff:
Valerie Elking , Kimberly Winburn , Amada Wright and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elking et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01466
Plaintiff:
Valerie Elking , Kimberly Winburn , Amada Wright and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ceasar v. Methvin et al
as 6:2017cv00476
Plaintiff:
Chanse Ceasar
Defendant:
Mildred Methvin, Richard T Haik, Higgindotham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv04993
Plaintiff:
Kathie L. Smith
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH et al
as 2:2011cv01115
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KATHY L. SMITH and GLENN S. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Smith v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv01877
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Smith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tarver et al v. Safety National Casualty Corp et al
as 5:2008cv00222
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Tarver, Dean Jasper, Charles Edward Parker and others
Defendant:
Safety National Casualty Corp, Singletary & Associates APLC, Michael D Singletary and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Smith v. Astrue
as 7:2007cv00314
Plaintiff:
Kathy L. Smith
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
