Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Parks v. Porteous et al
as 4:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Parks
Defendant:
Rohan Porteous, Mystic Transportation, LLC and United Transport, Inc. a/k/a United Transport, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Tackitt et al v. City of Corvallis, Oregon et al
as 6:2025cv01580
Plaintiff:
Chante Heavenly Angel Tackitt and Mario Boyd
Defendant:
City of Corvallis, Oregon, Benton County, Oregon, Officer Joshua Zessin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelley v. Kenneth Park Architect PLLC
as 1:2024cv06399
Defendant:
Kenneth Park Architect PLLC
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelley
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Kenneth Daywitt, et al v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-2484
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kenneth Daywitt, Kenneth Parks, Nicholas Luhmann and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Jodi Harpstead, in their official and individual capacities, Nancy Johnston, in their official and individual capacities, Kathryn Schesso, in their official and individual capacities and others
Kelley v. Kenneth Park Architect PLLC
as 1:2022cv02712
Plaintiff:
Michael Kelley
Defendant:
Kenneth Park Architect PLLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Daywitt et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv01848
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daywitt, Kenneth Parks, Nicholas Luhmann and others
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Kathryn Schesso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99406
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parks et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02503
Plaintiff:
Annie Parks and Kenneth Parks, Sr.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKS v. SPEARS et al
as 4:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PARKS
Defendant:
RONALD W SPEARS and Effingham County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
