Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Helton et al v. Hill et al
as 4:2018cv00025
Defendant: Joe Calhoun, Joseph D Calhoun LTD, Kent Hill and others
Plaintiff: Bill Helton and David Helton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LUCONTONI et al v. KENTS HILL SCHOOL et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff: JASON LUCONTONI and DAWN LUCONTONI
Defendant: KENTS HILL SCHOOL , COASTAL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION and WILLIAM VICKERY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HILL v. COOK INCORPORATED
as 1:2016cv03131
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Plaintiff: KENT HILL
225) 264-8780 (fax: Peyton P. Murphy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fields v. Barden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00590
Plaintiff: Walter B Fields, Jr
Defendant: Bailey Barden, Andrews, E Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KENTS HILL SCHOOL v. PRO AMBITIONS HOCKEY INC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00388
Plaintiff: KENTS HILL SCHOOL
Defendant: PRO AMBITIONS HOCKEY INC
Counter_claimant: PRO AMBITIONS HOCKEY INC
Counter_defendant: KENTS HILL SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Thornton et al
as 2:2015mc03697
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Onita Thornton
Garnishee: Kent Hill
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Rory Hill v. Nancy Doom
as 09-5687
Petitioner - Appellant: RORY KENT HILL
Respondent - Appellee: NANCY DOOM, Warden
Baldwin et al v. Hill
as 4:2009cv00325
Plaintiff: Bryan Baldwin and Russell Lewis
Defendant: Kent Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Torts - Injury None
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 5:2008ct03105
Plaintiff: James E. Rodgers
Defendant: Kent Hill, David Richards, Russell Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hill v. Doom
as 3:2008cv00331
Petitioner: Rory Kent Hill
Respondent: Nancy Doom
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?