Cases 11 - 20 of 77
Irizarry v. State of Ohio et al
as 4:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Ismael Irizarry
Defendant:
State of Ohio, ODRC, Annette Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rodwell v. Wicomico Detention Center et al.
as 1:2022cv03014
Plaintiff:
Tracey Michael Rodwell
Defendant:
Wicomico Detention Center and Lt. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GOULD v. OXIDINE et al
as 1:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
SALIMABDU GOULD
Defendant:
OFFICER OXIDINE, OFFICER HUNT, SERGENT DAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Lt Roman, Lt Davis, Chet Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Britton v. Davis et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00321
Plaintiff:
Fernandez Britton, Jr.
Defendant:
Lt. Davis and Officer Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unger v. W.C.R.C.F. et al
as 4:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Thomas Unger
Defendant:
W.C.R.C.F., Sheriff Melton M. Gaston and Lt. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carthen v. LaFave et al
as 7:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Tremane D. Carthen
Defendant:
Lt. LaFave, Lt. Bellamy, Lt. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brown v. Davis
as 3:2022cv00570
Plaintiff:
Robert Brown
Defendant:
Lt. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jividen et al
as 3:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Andred Clinton Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Betsy Gevidin, Carl Aldridge, Paul Diamond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giordano v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Philip A Giordano
Defendant:
United States of America, Corrections Officer Roberts, Corrections Officer Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
