Cases 1 - 10 of 65
US v. Gary Robinson
as 23-7024
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
GARY LAMONT ROBINSON, a/k/a Moet
ROBINSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12328
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK LAMONT ROBINSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robinson #232275 v. Dwyer et al
as 1:2023cv00863
Plaintiff:
Lamont Robinson #232275
Defendant:
Unknown Dwyer and M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. USA
as 1:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LAMONT ROBINSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Fernandez (Morales)
as 22-3168
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juan Fernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, AKA Tito, Odell Scarborough, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Yemalia Ayala, AKA Sealed Defendant 4, AKA Maggie and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Ramon Morales, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, AKA Seven
Robinson v. Petersen
as 22-3087
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARVELLE LAMONT ROBINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
HAZEL PETERSEN
Robinson v. USA
as 7:2022cv00065
Petitioner:
Gary Lamont Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Robinson (ID 85853) v. Petersen
as 5:2022cv03031
Petitioner:
Charvelle Lamont Robinson
Respondent:
Hazel Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. McPartland et al
as 1:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lamont Robinson
Defendant:
Judge Sean McPartland, Sarah Smith, Lindsey Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
