Cases 1 - 10 of 77
Johnson v. Bonta
as 3:2023cv06653
Petitioner:
Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Holmes, III et al
as 2:2023cv05321
Plaintiff:
Damien Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
William Harrison Holmes, III and Duane Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Bobbitt
as 1:2023cv03524
Petitioner:
Quentin Lamar Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
ANTHONY LAMAR JOHNSON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Ducey et al
as 2:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Tywan Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Doug Ducey, Laura M Reckart, Edward G Paine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. MATTHEWS
as 1:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARCUS MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Ma'at
as 2:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Smiley, Lt. Unknown McElroy, Captain Unknown Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Upton et al
as 5:2020cv00155
Defendant:
Chief FNU Williams, Stacey Webb, Chief FNU Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv01414
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Pope County Circuit Court, Pope County Detention Center, McGruder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
