Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,208
United States of America v. Sun (Wang)
as 24-461
Defendant: YING SUN, FRANK LIU, DIELONG WU and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Richard LayIn re: Richard Lay
as 24-30108
Petitioner: In re: Richard Lay
Moore v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00125
Plaintiff: Terrence Moore
Defendant: Kenyon Randle, Paul Harris, Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00381
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Griffin v. Frito-Lay Inc et al
as 4:2024cv04015
Plaintiff: Jeramiah J Griffin
Defendant: Frito-Lay Inc, Knox County Jail, Jack Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campos v. Jewel Food Stores Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff: Mary Ellen Campos
Defendant: Jewel Food Stores Inc, NEW ALBERTSONS L.P., Frito-Lay Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3752
Plaintiff: Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant: Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Jeanty v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09472
Plaintiff: Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant: The City of New York, Camba, Lt. Carlos Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shenzhen Lai Xing Cheng Furnishings Co., Ltd, v. Shenzhen Chenbei Tech Co., Ltd et al
as 1:2023cv17053
Plaintiff: Shenzhen Lai Xing Cheng Furnishings Co., Ltd, doing business as TForm Home
Defendant: Shenzhen Chenbei Tech Co., Ltd, Vesync (Singapore) PTE. Ltd and Vesyn Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv06571
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?