Cases 1 - 10 of 2,265
Michael Boyd v. Lay, et al
as 24-2449
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, ADC, WellPath, Corporation, Medical Service, Lay, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lavern Boyd
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
National Indemnity Company of the South v. Truong et al
as 6:2024cv01209
Plaintiff:
National Indemnity Company of the South
Defendant:
Thoa Thi Truong, Thanh Duc Tran, Crystal Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
National Indemnity Company of the South v. Thi Truong et al
as 6:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
National Indemnity Company of the South
Defendant:
Thoa Thi Truong, Thanh Duc Tran, Crystal Tran and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director ADC, Moses Jackson, III, Head Warden, ADC, M. Richardson, Deputy Warden, ADC and others
Lay v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01476
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lay
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lay v. Wolthuis
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lay #449238
Defendant:
C. Wolthuis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lay v. Hooper
as 24-30350
Petitioner:
Richard B. Lay
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Defendant:
J. Ybarra, C.O. Lay, K. Hofman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller Manufacturing Company v. Zhejiang Focus-On Imp. & Exp. Co. et al
as 0:2024cv02062
Plaintiff:
Miller Manufacturing Company
Defendant:
Zhejiang Focus-On Imp. & Exp. Co. and Tom Lai
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
