Cases 1 - 10 of 475
Short v. MSHDA et al
as 2:2024cv11127
Plaintiff:
QaShontae Hosomla Short
Defendant:
MSHDA, Becka Management, Michigan Rehabilitation Services and others
Looney v. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Jason Looney
Defendant:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
United States of America v. Artis (Campbell)
as 24-922
Defendant:
MALIK CAMPBELL, SOLOMON ARTIS, LEONARD BARLETTO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 7:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, Lt. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Robert Looney, Jr.
as 24-10377
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT NOONAN LOONEY, JR.
MOORE v. FINKE et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
LARRANCE DURELLE MOORE
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, OKALOOSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID RICHARD FINKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Lassiter v. Looney et al
as 2:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Looney, LT. Fleming, Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodson v. Dye et al
as 7:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Harry Woodson, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. T. Dye, Ms. Sater, Mr. Widener and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Looney v. American Economy Insurance Company et al
as 7:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Looney
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company and Bobby Vang
Not Classified By Court:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
