Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Hassler v. Mullin et al
as 1:2026cv13232
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Hassler
Defendant:
Markwayne Mullin, Joseph B. Edlow and Loren K. Miller
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
OWENS v. USA
as 1:2026cv00672
Petitioner:
MATTHEW RYAN OWENS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Gieske v. Fletcher
as 0:2026cv02988
Petitioner:
Matthew Ryan Gieske
Respondent:
Bob Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Foy v. Augafa et al
as 3:2026cv00077
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Foy
Defendant:
Jaremie Augafa and Daniel Rabb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plumbers and Pipefitters Locals 502 & 633 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Ryan Plumbing and Mechanical, LLC et al
as 3:2025cv00726
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Pipefitters Locals 502 & 633 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters Locals 502 & 633 Pension Trust Fund, Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 502 Joint Educational & Training Fund and others
Defendant:
Ryan Plumbing and Mechanical, LLC and Matthew Ryan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Arnold v. United States Government
as 2:2025cv02179
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ryan Arnold and Ramona Ramonae
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
