Cases 1 - 10 of 1,203
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rogan v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rogan
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Florence v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
Matthew Florence
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Isham v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Matthew Isham
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nichols
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
FARLEY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FARLEY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Gessel v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05038
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gessel
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pring v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff:
Matthew John Pring
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (SSID)
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Matthew Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ptak v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Paul Matthew Ptak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
