Cases 1 - 10 of 35
McKinnon et al v. Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Stuart McKinnon and Michael Cox
Defendant:
Kalkaska County Board of Commissioners, Kalkaska Memorial Health Center, kalkaska County Hospital Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
White et al v. Cox
as 1:2023cv12031
Plaintiff:
Rudolph White, Robert Cox, Kenley Exume and others
Defendant:
Michael Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv12098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
KIFER v. EVANSVILLE BUILDING AUTHORITY et al
as 3:2020cv00115
Defendant:
EVANSVILLE BUILDING AUTHORITY, HASSELER, KELLY FINK and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID A. KIFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
James et al v. Lydon et al
as 1:2019cv03366
Plaintiff:
Arlinda L Johns, Monica Josey James and Tray JOHNS
Defendant:
TANYA NGUYEN, KATIE OMBERG, REED MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Smith et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 3:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Sylvia Wear, Cindy Gillespie, Alfred Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Smith and Tiffany E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01704
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
