Cases 1 - 10 of 1,086
Saxena v. Jackson, et al
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
GRANT MITCHELL SAXENA
Defendant:
GARY M. JACKSON, MELISSA T. ANNIS, ZACHARY BANKS and others
Coker v. Columbia Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv01768
Plaintiff:
Michael James Coker
Defendant:
Columbia Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Turner v. Fox More Staffing et al
as 1:2024cv01411
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Fox More Staffing, Michael James, Michael Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nissen v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Michael James Nissen
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diogu v. Leva
as 24-20093
Plaintiff:
Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, as next friends of DKKD III and NMKD, minor children and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly, Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, Next Friend of DKKDIII and Diogu Kalu Diogu, II, Next Friend of NMKD
Defendant:
Jeff Leva, Sandy Dasigenis, Lilian Poetker, doing business as Foreclosure Network of Teas and others
USA v. Baniel
as 24-30137
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael J. Baniel, also known as Michael James Baniel
McDaniel v. USA
as 7:2024cv00031
Petitioner:
Michael James McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Nissen v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Michael James Nissen
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DiFranco v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Michael James DiFranco
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Carson v. State of Texas
as 4:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
Michael James Carson
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
