Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gilbert Amis v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv06598
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Amis
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation, MetaBank, N.A. and Pathward, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Evans v. NetSpend Corporation
as 22-50310
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Delarick William Evans, Native American Global-Exchange, its Chief Executive Officer
Defendant / Appellee:
NetSpend Corporation, in their individual/official capacity, CEO/President Antonio and NetSpend San Antonio
Johnson v. NetSpend Corporation
as 3:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Michael E Johnson
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Fees Transfer Act
Evans v. NetSpend Corporation
as 5:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Delarick William Evans
Defendant:
NetSpend Corporation in their individual/official capacity doing business as NetSpend San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. NETSPEND CARD PREPAID
as 3:2021cv20641
Plaintiff:
DARNELL ROSS
Defendant:
NETSPEND CARD PREPAID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caldwell v. Netspend Corporation et al
as 4:2021cv00527
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Caldwell
Defendant:
Netspend Corporation, Legal Department, Customer Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. Netspend Mastercard
as 4:2021cv00516
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Netspend Mastercard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morehouse v. Paypal, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04012
Defendant:
NETSPEND CORPORATION, Bancorp Bank, Paypal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ebony Morehouse
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 ef
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
