Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv04024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv10582
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nguyen v. Federal Express Corporation
as 2:2026cv03358
Plaintiff:
Phuong Nguyen
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2043
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2026cv00386
Plaintiff:
Darlene E. King
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Celene Fogarty, Lipman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tabatha Nguyen v. Erika Evans et al
as 5:2026cv05376
Plaintiff:
Tabatha Nguyen
Defendant:
Erika Evans, Alyssa Johnson and County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services, DPSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
nguyen v. ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD, A LIBERIAN CORPORATION d/b/a ROYAL CARIBBEAN
as 1:2026cv26369
Plaintiff:
david nguyen
Defendant:
ROYAL CARIBBEAN CRUISES LTD, A LIBERIAN CORPORATION d/b/a ROYAL CARIBBEAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 (a) Complaint in the Nature of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv26314
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
